2025年如何实施有效的MEV保护

作者：Nayan | Ancilar

最大可提取价值 (MEV) 已经从一个小众问题演变为影响整个区块链生态系统的根本挑战。根据 Flashbots 的数据，2023 年以太坊主网的 MEV 收入平均每天超过 50 万美元，尽管到 2024 年，它已稳定在每天约 30 万美元。当我们展望 2025 年时，理解和管理 MEV 对于开发者、协议设计者和 DeFi 参与者而言至关重要。

什么是 MEV，为什么它很重要？

最大可提取价值 (MEV) 衡量的是矿工通过其任意包含、排除或重新排序其产生的区块内的交易的能力所能获得的利润。矿工和网络验证者从加密货币市场的其他参与者那里收取的这种“隐形税”对区块链的公平性和效率具有深远的影响。

2025 年的 MEV 格局提出了独特的挑战：

• 三明治攻击构成了 2.8976 亿美元，占 MEV 交易总额 5.6192 亿美元的 51.56%
• Layer 2 扩展已经重新分配了 MEV 机会，但并未消除它们
• 主要协议正在迅速采用新的保护机制

技术架构：理解 MEV 提取

核心 MEV 策略

MEV 提取通常遵循以下模式：

1. 套利 (Arbitrage)：利用 DEX 之间的价格差异
2. 三明治攻击 (Sandwich Attacks)：抢先交易和尾随交易用户交易
3. 清算 (Liquidations)：竞争清算抵押不足的头寸
4. JIT 流动性 (JIT Liquidity)：即时流动性供应以获得最佳费用

代码示例：基本 MEV 检测

// MEV Detection Smart Contract
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;

contract MEVDetector {
    struct TransactionData {
        address from;
        address to;
        uint256 value;
        uint256 gasPrice;
        uint256 blockNumber;
        uint256 transactionIndex;
    }
    mapping(bytes32 => TransactionData) public transactions;
    mapping(address => uint256) public suspiciousActivity;
    event PotentialMEVDetected(
        address indexed actor,
        bytes32 indexed txHash,
        string strategy
    );
    function detectSandwichAttack(
        bytes32 frontRunTx,
        bytes32 victimTx,
        bytes32 backRunTx
    ) external view returns (bool) {
        TransactionData memory front = transactions[frontRunTx];
        TransactionData memory victim = transactions[victimTx];
        TransactionData memory back = transactions[backRunTx];
        // Check if transactions are sequential
        // 检查交易是否按顺序排列
        if (front.transactionIndex + 1 != victim.transactionIndex ||
            victim.transactionIndex + 1 != back.transactionIndex) {
            return false;
        }
        // Check if same actor for front and back
        // 检查前后是否为同一参与者
        if (front.from != back.from) {
            return false;
        }
        // Check gas price pattern (front-runner pays higher gas)
        // 检查 gas 价格模式(抢跑者支付更高的 gas)
        if (front.gasPrice <= victim.gasPrice) {
            return false;
        }
        return true;
    }
    function recordTransaction(
        bytes32 txHash,
        address from,
        address to,
        uint256 value,
        uint256 gasPrice
    ) external {
        transactions[txHash] = TransactionData({
            from: from,
            to: to,
            value: value,
            gasPrice: gasPrice,
            blockNumber: block.number,
            transactionIndex: tx.origin == from ? 0 : 1 // Simplified
        });
    }
}

高级 MEV 保护实施

// MEV Protection Service
// MEV 保护服务
class MEVProtectionService {
    constructor(provider, flashbotsUrl) {
        this.provider = provider;
        this.flashbotsUrl = flashbotsUrl;
        this.protectedTransactions = new Map();
    }
async submitProtectedTransaction(transaction) {
        const txHash = this.generateTxHash(transaction);
        try {
            // Submit to Flashbots Protect RPC
            // 提交到 Flashbots Protect RPC
            const response = await fetch(this.flashbotsUrl, {
                method: 'POST',
                headers: {
                    'Content-Type': 'application/json',
                },
                body: JSON.stringify({
                    jsonrpc: '2.0',
                    method: 'eth_sendRawTransaction',
                    params: [transaction.rawTx],
                    id: 1
                })
            });
            const result = await response.json();
            if (result.error) {
                throw new Error(`Flashbots submission failed: ${result.error.message}`);
            }
            this.protectedTransactions.set(txHash, {
                submittedAt: Date.now(),
                status: 'pending',
                flashbotsTxHash: result.result
            });
            return result.result;
        } catch (error) {
            console.error('MEV Protection failed:', error);
            // Fallback to public mempool with warning
            // 回退到公共内存池，并发出警告
            return this.fallbackSubmission(transaction);
        }
    }
    async estimateGasWithMEVProtection(transaction) {
        // Simulate transaction to estimate gas under MEV protection
        // 模拟交易以估计 MEV 保护下的 gas
        const simulationResult = await this.provider.call({
            to: transaction.to,
            data: transaction.data,
            value: transaction.value,
            from: transaction.from
        });
        // Add 10% buffer for MEV protection overhead
        // 为 MEV 保护开销增加 10% 的缓冲区
        const baseGas = await this.provider.estimateGas(transaction);
        return Math.ceil(baseGas * 1.1);
    }
    generateTxHash(transaction) {
        const hash = ethers.utils.keccak256(
            ethers.utils.defaultAbiCoder.encode(
                ['address', 'address', 'uint256', 'bytes'],
                [transaction.from, transaction.to, transaction.value, transaction.data]
            )
        );
        return hash;
    }
    async fallbackSubmission(transaction) {
        console.warn('Falling back to public mempool - MEV protection unavailable');
        // 回退到公共内存池 - MEV 保护不可用
        return this.provider.sendTransaction(transaction);
    }
}

MEV 保护性能分析

根据最近的基准研究，以下是不同 MEV 保护服务的性能：

// MEV Protection Benchmark Suite
// MEV 保护基准测试套件
class MEVProtectionBenchmark {
    constructor() {
        this.providers = {
            flashbots: '<https://rpc.flashbots.net>',
            blocker: '<https://rpc.blocker.org>',
            merkle: '<https://rpc.merkle.io>',
            blink: '<https://rpc.blink.org>'
        };
        this.results = new Map();
    }
async benchmarkProviders(testTransaction) {
        const startTime = performance.now();
        const promises = [];
        for (const [name, url] of Object.entries(this.providers)) {
            promises.push(
                this.testProvider(name, url, testTransaction)
                    .then(result => ({ provider: name, ...result }))
                    .catch(error => ({ provider: name, error: error.message }))
            );
        }
        const results = await Promise.all(promises);
        const totalTime = performance.now() - startTime;
        return {
            totalTime,
            results,
            summary: this.generateSummary(results)
        };
    }
    async testProvider(name, url, transaction) {
        const startTime = performance.now();
        const response = await fetch(url, {
            method: 'POST',
            headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
            body: JSON.stringify({
                jsonrpc: '2.0',
                method: 'eth_sendRawTransaction',
                params: [transaction.rawTx],
                id: 1
            })
        });
        const responseTime = performance.now() - startTime;
        const result = await response.json();
        return {
            responseTime,
            success: !result.error,
            txHash: result.result,
            error: result.error?.message
        };
    }
    generateSummary(results) {
        const successful = results.filter(r => r.success);
        const failed = results.filter(r => !r.success);
        return {
            successRate: (successful.length / results.length) * 100,
            averageResponseTime: successful.reduce((sum, r) => sum + r.responseTime, 0) / successful.length,
            fastestProvider: successful.sort((a, b) => a.responseTime - b.responseTime)[0]?.provider,
            failedProviders: failed.map(r => r.provider)
        };
    }
}

性能结果（2025 年基准）

最近的基准研究表明，并非所有私有 RPC 都能产生相同的结果，这对交易效率和执行质量具有重大影响。我们的测试显示：

• Flashbots Protect：98.5% 成功率，245 毫秒响应，出色的 MEV 保护
• Blocker：96.2% 成功率，180 毫秒响应，良好的 MEV 保护
• Merkle：94.8% 成功率，220 毫秒响应，非常好的 MEV 保护
• Blink：92.1% 成功率，165 毫秒响应，一般的 MEV 保护

安全分析和最佳实践

MEV 攻击媒介和缓解措施

// Security Analysis Framework
// 安全分析框架
class MEVSecurityAnalyzer {
    constructor() {
        this.vulnerabilities = new Set();
        this.mitigations = new Map();
    }
analyzeContract(contractCode) {
        const analysis = {
            riskLevel: 'LOW',
            vulnerabilities: [],
            recommendations: []
        };
        // Check for MEV vulnerability patterns
        // 检查 MEV 漏洞模式
        if (this.hasArbitrageOpportunity(contractCode)) {
            analysis.vulnerabilities.push('ARBITRAGE_VULNERABLE');
            analysis.riskLevel = 'MEDIUM';
        }
        if (this.hasSandwichVulnerability(contractCode)) {
            analysis.vulnerabilities.push('SANDWICH_VULNERABLE');
            analysis.riskLevel = 'HIGH';
        }
        if (this.hasLiquidationRisk(contractCode)) {
            analysis.vulnerabilities.push('LIQUIDATION_RISK');
            analysis.riskLevel = 'MEDIUM';
        }
        // Generate recommendations
        // 生成建议
        analysis.recommendations = this.generateRecommendations(analysis.vulnerabilities);
        return analysis;
    }
    hasArbitrageOpportunity(code) {
        // Check for price oracle dependencies
        // 检查价格预言机依赖项
        return code.includes('getPrice') || code.includes('latestRoundData');
    }
    hasSandwichVulnerability(code) {
        // Check for AMM interactions without slippage protection
        // 检查没有滑点保护的 AMM 交互
        return code.includes('swapExactTokensForTokens') &&
               !code.includes('deadline') &&
               !code.includes('amountOutMin');
    }
    hasLiquidationRisk(code) {
        // Check for lending protocol patterns
        // 检查贷款协议模式
        return code.includes('liquidate') || code.includes('collateralFactor');
    }
    generateRecommendations(vulnerabilities) {
        const recommendations = [];
        if (vulnerabilities.includes('ARBITRAGE_VULNERABLE')) {
            recommendations.push('Implement TWAP oracles to reduce price manipulation');
            // 实施 TWAP 预言机以减少价格操纵
            recommendations.push('Use commit-reveal schemes for sensitive operations');
            // 对敏感操作使用提交-揭示方案
        }
        if (vulnerabilities.includes('SANDWICH_VULNERABLE')) {
            recommendations.push('Implement minimum slippage protection');
            // 实施最低滑点保护
            recommendations.push('Use private mempools for sensitive swaps');
            // 对敏感交换使用私有内存池
            recommendations.push('Consider Dutch auction mechanisms');
            // 考虑荷兰式拍卖机制
        }
        if (vulnerabilities.includes('LIQUIDATION_RISK')) {
            recommendations.push('Implement Dutch auction liquidations');
            // 实施荷兰式拍卖清算
            recommendations.push('Add liquidation delay mechanisms');
            // 添加清算延迟机制
        }
        return recommendations;
    }
}

安全的抗 MEV 合约设计

// MEV-Resistant DEX Implementation
// 抗 MEV DEX 实施
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;

import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol";
contract MEVResistantDEX is ReentrancyGuard, Ownable {
    struct Order {
        address trader;
        address tokenIn;
        address tokenOut;
        uint256 amountIn;
        uint256 minAmountOut;
        uint256 deadline;
        uint256 salt;
        bytes32 commitment;
    }
    mapping(bytes32 => Order) public orders;
    mapping(address => uint256) public nonces;
    uint256 public constant COMMIT_REVEAL_DELAY = 2 minutes;
    event OrderCommitted(bytes32 indexed orderHash, address indexed trader);
    event OrderExecuted(bytes32 indexed orderHash, uint256 amountOut);
    modifier onlyAfterRevealPeriod(bytes32 orderHash) {
        require(
            block.timestamp >= orders[orderHash].deadline + COMMIT_REVEAL_DELAY,
            "Still in commit period"
        );
        _;
    }
    // Commit-reveal mechanism to prevent MEV
    // 提交-揭示机制，以防止 MEV
    function commitOrder(bytes32 commitment) external {
        bytes32 orderHash = keccak256(
            abi.encodePacked(msg.sender, nonces[msg.sender]++, commitment)
        );
        orders[orderHash] = Order({
            trader: msg.sender,
            tokenIn: address(0),
            tokenOut: address(0),
            amountIn: 0,
            minAmountOut: 0,
            deadline: block.timestamp,
            salt: 0,
            commitment: commitment
        });
        emit OrderCommitted(orderHash, msg.sender);
    }
    function revealAndExecute(
        bytes32 orderHash,
        address tokenIn,
        address tokenOut,
        uint256 amountIn,
        uint256 minAmountOut,
        uint256 salt
    ) external nonReentrant onlyAfterRevealPeriod(orderHash) {
        Order storage order = orders[orderHash];
        require(order.trader == msg.sender, "Not order owner");
        // Verify commitment
        // 验证承诺
        bytes32 expectedCommitment = keccak256(
            abi.encodePacked(tokenIn, tokenOut, amountIn, minAmountOut, salt)
        );
        require(order.commitment == expectedCommitment, "Invalid reveal");
        // Execute trade with MEV protection
        // 执行具有 MEV 保护的交易
        uint256 amountOut = _executeSwap(tokenIn, tokenOut, amountIn, minAmountOut);
        emit OrderExecuted(orderHash, amountOut);
        delete orders[orderHash];
    }
    function _executeSwap(
        address tokenIn,
        address tokenOut,
        uint256 amountIn,
        uint256 minAmountOut
    ) internal returns (uint256) {
        // Implement actual swap logic with slippage protection
        // 实施具有滑点保护的实际交换逻辑
        // This would integrate with your AMM implementation
        // 这将与你的 AMM 实施集成
        return minAmountOut; // Simplified
        // 简化
    }
}

MEV 保护的测试策略

综合 MEV 测试框架

// MEV Testing Suite
// MEV 测试套件
class MEVTestSuite {
    constructor(provider, contractAddress) {
        this.provider = provider;
        this.contractAddress = contractAddress;
        this.testResults = [];
    }
async runComprehensiveTests() {
        console.log('Starting MEV vulnerability tests...');
        // 开始 MEV 漏洞测试...
        const tests = [
            this.testSandwichAttack,
            this.testArbitrageOpportunity,
            this.testLiquidationMEV,
            this.testFrontRunning,
            this.testBackRunning
        ];
        for (const test of tests) {
            try {
                const result = await test.call(this);
                this.testResults.push(result);
                console.log(`✓ ${result.name}: ${result.passed ? 'PASSED' : 'FAILED'}`);
            } catch (error) {
                console.error(`✗ Test failed: ${error.message}`);
            }
        }
        return this.generateReport();
    }
    async testSandwichAttack() {
        // Simulate sandwich attack scenario
        // 模拟三明治攻击场景
        const victimTx = {
            to: this.contractAddress,
            data: '0x...', // Swap transaction data
            // 交换交易数据
            value: 0,
            gasPrice: ethers.utils.parseUnits('20', 'gwei')
        };
        const frontRunTx = {
            ...victimTx,
            gasPrice: ethers.utils.parseUnits('25', 'gwei')
        };
        const backRunTx = {
            ...victimTx,
            gasPrice: ethers.utils.parseUnits('19', 'gwei')
        };
        // Test if sandwich attack is possible
        // 测试是否可能进行三明治攻击
        const sandwichProfit = await this.simulateSandwich(
            frontRunTx, victimTx, backRunTx
        );
        return {
            name: 'Sandwich Attack Resistance',
            // 三明治攻击抵抗力
            passed: sandwichProfit <= 0,
            details: `Potential profit: ${sandwichProfit} ETH`
            // 潜在利润：
        };
    }
    async testArbitrageOpportunity() {
        // Test for arbitrage opportunities
        // 测试套利机会
        const price1 = await this.getPriceFromDEX1();
        const price2 = await this.getPriceFromDEX2();
        const arbitrageOpportunity = Math.abs(price1 - price2) / Math.min(price1, price2);
        return {
            name: 'Arbitrage Opportunity',
            // 套利机会
            passed: arbitrageOpportunity < 0.01, // Less than 1% difference
            // 小于 1% 的差异
            details: `Price difference: ${(arbitrageOpportunity * 100).toFixed(2)}%`
            // 价格差异：
        };
    }
    async testLiquidationMEV() {
        // Test liquidation MEV opportunities
        // 测试清算 MEV 机会
        const liquidationThreshold = await this.getLiquidationThreshold();
        const currentCollateralRatio = await this.getCurrentCollateralRatio();
        const liquidationDistance = (currentCollateralRatio - liquidationThreshold) / liquidationThreshold;
        return {
            name: 'Liquidation MEV Risk',
            // 清算 MEV 风险
            passed: liquidationDistance > 0.1, // 10% buffer
            // 10％ 的缓冲
            details: `Liquidation distance: ${(liquidationDistance * 100).toFixed(2)}%`
            // 清算距离：
        };
    }
    async simulateSandwich(frontTx, victimTx, backTx) {
        // Simulate the sandwich attack
        // 模拟三明治攻击
        const initialBalance = await this.provider.getBalance(frontTx.from);
        // Execute transactions in sequence
        // 按顺序执行交易
        await this.provider.sendTransaction(frontTx);
        await this.provider.sendTransaction(victimTx);
        await this.provider.sendTransaction(backTx);
        const finalBalance = await this.provider.getBalance(frontTx.from);
        return ethers.utils.formatEther(finalBalance.sub(initialBalance));
    }
    generateReport() {
        const passed = this.testResults.filter(r => r.passed).length;
        const total = this.testResults.length;
        return {
            summary: `${passed}/${total} tests passed`,
            // 通过了 ${passed}/${total} 项测试
            score: (passed / total) * 100,
            results: this.testResults,
            recommendations: this.generateRecommendations()
        };
    }
    generateRecommendations() {
        const recommendations = [];
        this.testResults.forEach(result => {
            if (!result.passed) {
                switch (result.name) {
                    case 'Sandwich Attack Resistance':
                        recommendations.push('Implement commit-reveal mechanism');
                        // 实施提交-揭示机制
                        recommendations.push('Use private mempool for sensitive operations');
                        // 对敏感操作使用私有内存池
                        break;
                    case 'Arbitrage Opportunity':
                        recommendations.push('Implement TWAP pricing mechanisms');
                         // 实施 TWAP 定价机制
                        recommendations.push('Add minimum time delays between trades');
                        // 在交易之间添加最短时间延迟
                        break;
                    case 'Liquidation MEV Risk':
                        recommendations.push('Implement Dutch auction liquidations');
                         // 实施荷兰式拍卖清算
                        recommendations.push('Add liquidation delay mechanisms');
                        // 添加清算延迟机制
                        break;
                }
            }
        });
        return [...new Set(recommendations)];
    }
}

当前行业解决方案和集成

Flashbots 集成

Uniswap Labs 宣布其移动钱包已集成 Flashbots 保护功能，为以太坊网络上的所有交易自动提供用户保护。这代表着向主流 MEV 保护采用的重大转变。

// Flashbots Integration Example
// Flashbots 集成示例
class FlashbotsIntegration {
    constructor() {
        this.flashbotsRelay = '<https://relay.flashbots.net>';
        this.protectRPC = '<https://rpc.flashbots.net>';
    }
async protectTransaction(wallet, transaction) {
        // Use Flashbots Protect RPC
        // 使用 Flashbots Protect RPC
        const provider = new ethers.providers.JsonRpcProvider(this.protectRPC);
        const protectedTx = {
            ...transaction,
            // Flashbots will handle MEV protection automatically
            // Flashbots 将自动处理 MEV 保护
            gasPrice: await provider.getGasPrice()
        };
        return wallet.connect(provider).sendTransaction(protectedTx);
    }
    async submitBundle(transactions) {
        // Submit transaction bundle to Flashbots
        // 将交易包提交到 Flashbots
        const bundle = {
            transactions,
            blockNumber: await this.provider.getBlockNumber() + 1
        };
        const response = await fetch(`${this.flashbotsRelay}/v1/bundle`, {
            method: 'POST',
            headers: {
                'Content-Type': 'application/json',
                'X-Flashbots-Signature': this.signBundle(bundle)
            },
            body: JSON.stringify(bundle)
        });
        return response.json();
    }
}

未来展望和新兴趋势

2025 年 MEV 格局

最近的分析表明，MEV 已成为限制区块链扩展的主要因素，从根本上改变了我们处理区块链架构的方式。主要趋势包括：

1. 跨链 MEV (Cross-chain MEV)：随着多链生态系统的成熟，跨链 MEV 变得越来越重要
2. AI 驱动的 MEV 检测 (AI-powered MEV detection)：用于实时 MEV 检测和预防的机器学习算法
3. 协议级 MEV 抵抗 (Protocol-level MEV resistance)：旨在最大限度地减少 MEV 提取的新共识机制
4. 监管关注 (Regulatory attention)：监管机构对 MEV 实践的日益关注

新兴解决方案

// Next-generation MEV protection
// 下一代 MEV 保护
class AdvancedMEVProtection {
    constructor() {
        this.aiModel = new MEVDetectionAI();
        this.crossChainRelayer = new CrossChainRelayer();
    }
async predictMEV(transaction) {
        // Use AI to predict MEV risk
        // 使用 AI 预测 MEV 风险
        const riskScore = await this.aiModel.predict(transaction);
        if (riskScore > 0.7) {
            return this.applyCrossChainProtection(transaction);
        }
        return this.applyStandardProtection(transaction);
    }
    async applyCrossChainProtection(transaction) {
        // Route through multiple chains to avoid MEV
        // 通过多条链路由以避免 MEV
        const route = await this.crossChainRelayer.findOptimalRoute(transaction);
        return this.crossChainRelayer.execute(route);
    }
}

结论

在 2025 年管理 MEV 需要一种多层方法，将技术解决方案、安全最佳实践和新兴的保护机制相结合。随着生态系统的不断发展，开发人员必须随时了解新的威胁和缓解策略。

2025 年的主要要点：

1. 主动保护 (Proactive Protection)：在协议级别实施 MEV 保护，而不是事后才考虑
2. 多供应商策略 (Multi-provider Strategy)：不要依赖单一的 MEV 保护服务
3. 持续测试 (Continuous Testing)：定期的 MEV 漏洞评估至关重要
4. 用户教育 (User Education)：帮助用户了解 MEV 风险和保护选项
5. 面向未来 (Future-proofing)：设计能够适应新兴 MEV 策略的系统

通过遵循这些原则并实施本指南中概述的策略，开发人员可以构建更强大、更公平和更高效的 DeFi 应用程序，从而保护用户免受 MEV 剥削，同时保持去中心化金融的优势。

与 MEV 的斗争仍在继续，但凭借正确的工具和策略，我们可以为每个人构建一个更公平的区块链生态系统。

本文代表了 2025 年 MEV 保护的现状。区块链领域发展迅速，因此在实施之前，请务必验证最新的安全实践和保护机制。

• 原文链接： medium.com/@ancilartech/...
• 登链社区 AI 助手，为大家转译优秀英文文章，如有翻译不通的地方，还请包涵～