⚡ Gas消耗战:可以节省数百万美元的Solidity终极优化手册

本文深入探讨了以太坊智能合约的Gas优化,通过存储优化、内存管理、循环优化、高级模式和实际案例研究,详细讲解如何降低交易成本,提高dApp的可访问性、竞争力和盈利能力。强调了gas优化是区分原型和生产级dApp的关键,并提供了实用的优化清单和技术。

LinkedIn 上关注我,获取更多区块链开发内容。

你正盯着你的智能合约部署,看着 gas 费用比牛市期间的 DeFi 代币涨得还高。你的用户在抱怨 200 美元的交易成本,你的协议正在将用户流失给竞争对手,而你想知道是否有办法让以太坊再次变得负担得起。听起来是不是很熟悉?欢迎来到残酷的 gas 优化世界 —— 一个写得不好的循环可能会让你的用户损失数千美元,而一个优化的函数可以让你成为英雄!🚀

在优化了 200 多个智能合约并为协议节省了数百万美元的 gas 费用后,我可以告诉你:gas 优化不仅仅是让事情变得更便宜 —— 而是让你的 dApp 具有可访问性、竞争力和盈利能力。这是一份完整的战争手册,可以将“为什么我的合约如此昂贵?”转化为“他们是如何让它如此便宜的?”⚡

Gas 优化革命:每一 Wei 都重要 💎

想象一下启动一个 DeFi 协议,用户因为 gas 成本高于他们的交易利润而放弃交易。这就像开一家餐厅,服务费比饭菜还贵。Gas 优化提供了战略优势,使你的合约不仅功能齐全,而且对真实用户具有经济可行性。

Gas 战场层级:

🔥 Storage Operations(存储操作) —— 最昂贵的领域

Memory Management(内存管理) —— 智能分配节省数千

🎯 Loop Optimization(循环优化) —— 业余爱好者在这里输掉战争

📦 Data Packing(数据打包) —— 将多个值压缩到单个插槽中

🛠️ Assembly Magic(汇编魔法) —— 终极优化武器

🔄 Pattern Recognition(模式识别) —— 避免常见的 gas 陷阱

第一步:Storage Optimization(存储优化)—— Gas 战场 🔥

存储操作是 gas 消耗的核武器。每个 SSTORE 操作花费 20,000+ gas,而 SLOAD 花费 2,100 gas。了解存储布局是你的第一道防线。

存储战争演示

// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
contract StorageWars {
    // ❌ 错误:单独的存储插槽 = 昂贵
    struct BadUser {
        uint256 balance;      // Slot 0
        uint128 lastAction;   // Slot 1
        bool isActive;        // Slot 2 (浪费 255 位!)
        uint64 reputation;    // Slot 3 (浪费 192 位!)
    }

    // ✅ 良好:打包存储 = 大量节省
    struct GoodUser {
        uint256 balance;      // Slot 0 (完整插槽)
        uint128 lastAction;   // Slot 1 (前半部分)
        uint64 reputation;    // Slot 1 (剩余空间)
        bool isActive;        // Slot 1 (1 位,剩余 63 位)
    }

    mapping(address => BadUser) public badUsers;
    mapping(address => GoodUser) public goodUsers;

    // 🔥 存储插槽优化正在进行
    uint256 private constant BALANCE_MASK = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
    uint256 private constant LAST_ACTION_MASK = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
    uint256 private constant REPUTATION_MASK = 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
    uint256 private constant ACTIVE_MASK = 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001;

    // ❌ 昂贵:多个存储操作
    function updateUserBad(address user, uint256 newBalance, bool active) external {
        badUsers[user].balance = newBalance;        // SSTORE: ~20,000 gas
        badUsers[user].lastAction = uint128(block.timestamp); // SSTORE: ~20,000 gas
        badUsers[user].isActive = active;          // SSTORE: ~20,000 gas
        badUsers[user].reputation += 1;            // SLOAD + SSTORE: ~22,100 gas
        // Total: ~82,100 gas
    }

    // ✅ 便宜:使用打包的单个存储操作
    function updateUserGood(address user, uint256 newBalance, bool active) external {
        GoodUser storage userData = goodUsers[user];

        // 将所有内容打包到最小的存储写入中
        userData.balance = newBalance;             // SSTORE: ~20,000 gas

        // 将多个值打包到一个插槽中
        uint256 packedData = (uint256(block.timestamp) << 128) |
                           (uint256(userData.reputation + 1) << 64) |
                           (active ? 1 : 0);

        // 用于多个值的单个存储写入
        assembly {
            let slot := add(userData.slot, 1)
            sstore(slot, packedData)               // SSTORE: ~20,000 gas
        }
        // Total: ~40,000 gas (节省 51%!)
    }

    // 🚀 终极:用于最大效率的位运算
    mapping(address => uint256) private packedUserData;

    function ultraEfficientUpdate(
        address user,
        uint128 balance,
        uint64 timestamp,
        uint32 reputation,
        bool active
    ) external {
        uint256 packed = (uint256(balance) << 128) |
                        (uint256(timestamp) << 64) |
                        (uint256(reputation) << 32) |
                        (active ? 1 : 0);

        packedUserData[user] = packed;             // 单个 SSTORE: ~20,000 gas
        // 总计:~20,000 gas(比原始节省 76%!)
    }

    function getPackedUserData(address user) external view returns (
        uint128 balance,
        uint64 timestamp,
        uint32 reputation,
        bool active
    ) {
        uint256 packed = packedUserData[user];
        balance = uint128(packed >> 128);
        timestamp = uint64(packed >> 64);
        reputation = uint32(packed >> 32);
        active = (packed & 1) == 1;
    }
}

Gas 成本比较表

操作类型 糟糕的实现 良好的实现 节省
用户更新 ~82,100 gas ~40,000 gas 51%
超高效 ~82,100 gas ~20,000 gas 76%
批量操作 ~500,000 gas ~150,000 gas 70%

第二步:Memory(内存)和 Calldata(调用数据)精通 ⚡

内存分配和数据位置选择可能会成就或破坏你的 gas 效率。了解何时使用 memorycalldatastorage 至关重要。

contract MemoryMastery {
    uint256[] public storedArray;

    // ❌ 昂贵:内存数组成本高昂
    function processArrayBad(uint256[] memory data) public pure returns (uint256) {
        uint256 sum = 0;
        for (uint256 i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
            sum += data[i]; // 内存读取:每次操作 ~3 gas
        }
        return sum;
    }

    // ✅ 便宜:Calldata 读取是免费的
    function processArrayGood(uint256[] calldata data) external pure returns (uint256) {
        uint256 sum = 0;
        uint256 length = data.length; // 缓存长度
        for (uint256 i = 0; i < length; i++) {
            sum += data[i]; // Calldata 读取:每次操作 ~3 gas
        }
        return sum;
    }

    // 🚀 终极:用于最大效率的汇编
    function processArrayUltimate(uint256[] calldata data) external pure returns (uint256 sum) {
        assembly {
            let length := data.length
            let dataPtr := data.offset

            for { let i := 0 } lt(i, length) { i := add(i, 1) } {
                sum := add(sum, calldataload(add(dataPtr, mul(i, 0x20))))
            }
        }
    }

    // 🎯 高级:使用最少的内存分配进行批量处理
    function batchProcessOptimized(
        uint256[] calldata amounts,
        address[] calldata recipients
    ) external returns (bool) {
        require(amounts.length == recipients.length, "Length mismatch");

        uint256 length = amounts.length;
        uint256 totalAmount = 0;

        // 单个循环,最小的内存使用量
        for (uint256 i = 0; i < length; i++) {
            totalAmount += amounts[i];
            // 直接 Calldata 访问,没有内存分配
            emit Transfer(msg.sender, recipients[i], amounts[i]);
        }

        require(totalAmount <= address(this).balance, "Insufficient balance");
        return true;
    }

    // 🔥 专业提示:字符串操作优化
    function efficientStringConcat(
        string calldata a,
        string calldata b
    ) external pure returns (string memory result) {
        // 预先计算总长度
        uint256 aLen = bytes(a).length;
        uint256 bLen = bytes(b).length;

        // 分配所需的精确内存
        bytes memory concatenated = new bytes(aLen + bLen);

        // 用于有效复制的汇编
        assembly {
            let resultPtr := add(concatenated, 0x20)

            // 复制第一个字符串
            calldatacopy(resultPtr, a.offset, aLen)

            // 复制第二个字符串
            calldatacopy(add(resultPtr, aLen), b.offset, bLen)
        }

        return string(concatenated);
    }

    event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
}

第三步:Loop Optimization(循环优化)—— 战斗的胜利之处 🎯

循环是大多数开发人员输掉 gas 战争的地方。低效的循环会消耗数百万 gas,而优化的循环会处理相同的数据数千次。

contract LoopOptimization {
    mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
    uint256[] public values;

    // ❌ 可怕:多种低效率
    function badLoopPattern(uint256[] memory data) public {
        for (uint256 i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {        // 每次迭代都读取长度
            if (data[i] > 0) {                              // 不必要的条件
                balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender] + data[i]; // 双倍存储读取
                values.push(data[i]);                       // 动态数组扩展
            }
        }
    }

    // ✅ 良好:应用了基本优化
    function goodLoopPattern(uint256[] calldata data) external {
        uint256 length = data.length;                       // 缓存长度
        uint256 currentBalance = balances[msg.sender];      // 缓存存储

        for (uint256 i = 0; i < length; i++) {
            uint256 value = data[i];                        // 缓存数组元素
            if (value > 0) {
                currentBalance += value;                    // 内存操作
            }
        }

        balances[msg.sender] = currentBalance;              // 单个存储写入
    }

    // 🚀 终极:高级循环优化
    function ultimateLoopPattern(uint256[] calldata data) external {
        uint256 length = data.length;
        if (length == 0) return;                            // 提前退出

        uint256 accumulator = balances[msg.sender];
        uint256 i = 0;

        // 展开循环以提高 gas 效率
        for (; i < length - (length % 4); i += 4) {
            accumulator += data[i] + data[i+1] + data[i+2] + data[i+3];
        }

        // 处理剩余元素
        for (; i < length; i++) {
            accumulator += data[i];
        }

        balances[msg.sender] = accumulator;
    }

    // 🔥 用于最大性能的汇编循环
    function assemblyLoop(uint256[] calldata data) external {
        uint256 currentBalance = balances[msg.sender];

        assembly {
            let length := data.length
            let dataPtr := data.offset
            let sum := 0

            for { let i := 0 } lt(i, length) { i := add(i, 1) } {
                sum := add(sum, calldataload(add(dataPtr, mul(i, 0x20))))
            }

            currentBalance := add(currentBalance, sum)
        }

        balances[msg.sender] = currentBalance;
    }

    // 🎯 高级:使用事件进行批量处理
    function batchProcessWithEvents(
        address[] calldata recipients,
        uint256[] calldata amounts
    ) external {
        uint256 length = recipients.length;
        require(length == amounts.length && length > 0, "Invalid input");

        uint256 totalAmount = 0;
        uint256 senderBalance = balances[msg.sender];

        // 单个循环完成所有操作
        for (uint256 i = 0; i < length; i++) {
            uint256 amount = amounts[i];
            address recipient = recipients[i];

            totalAmount += amount;
            balances[recipient] += amount;

            emit Transfer(msg.sender, recipient, amount);
        }

        require(senderBalance >= totalAmount, "Insufficient balance");
        balances[msg.sender] = senderBalance - totalAmount;
    }

    event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
}

第四步:高级优化模式 🛠️

模式 1:Bit Manipulation(位操作)精通

contract BitManipulationMaster {
    // 🎯 将多个布尔值打包到单个 uint256 中
    mapping(address => uint256) private userFlags;

    // 而不是 8 个单独的布尔存储插槽
    uint256 private constant FLAG_ACTIVE = 1;
    uint256 private constant FLAG_VERIFIED = 2;
    uint256 private constant FLAG_PREMIUM = 4;
    uint256 private constant FLAG_BANNED = 8;
    uint256 private constant FLAG_MODERATOR = 16;
    uint256 private constant FLAG_ADMIN = 32;
    uint256 private constant FLAG_FOUNDER = 64;
    uint256 private constant FLAG_BETA = 128;

    function setUserFlag(address user, uint256 flag, bool value) external {
        if (value) {
            userFlags[user] |= flag;        // 设置位
        } else {
            userFlags[user] &= ~flag;       // 清除位
        }
    }

    function getUserFlag(address user, uint256 flag) external view returns (bool) {
        return (userFlags[user] & flag) != 0;
    }

    // 🚀 批量标志操作
    function setMultipleFlags(address user, uint256 flagMask) external {
        userFlags[user] = flagMask;         // 单个存储写入
    }

    // 🔥 高级:高效地打包用户数据
    struct PackedUser {
        uint128 balance;        // 16 字节
        uint64 lastSeen;        // 8 字节
        uint32 reputation;      // 4 字节
        uint16 level;           // 2 字节
        uint8 flags;            // 1 字节
        uint8 category;         // 1 字节
        // 总计:32 字节 = 1 个存储插槽
    }

    mapping(address => PackedUser) public packedUsers;

    function updatePackedUser(
        address user,
        uint128 balance,
        uint32 reputation,
        uint8 flags
    ) external {
        PackedUser storage userData = packedUsers[user];
        userData.balance = balance;
        userData.lastSeen = uint64(block.timestamp);
        userData.reputation = reputation;
        userData.flags = flags;
        // 同一存储插槽中的所有更新 = 单个 SSTORE
    }
}

模式 2:Assembly Optimization(汇编优化)技术

contract AssemblyOptimizations {
    // 🔥 超高效的数组操作
    function efficientArrayCopy(
        uint256[] calldata source
    ) external pure returns (uint256[] memory destination) {
        uint256 length = source.length;
        destination = new uint256[](length);

        assembly {
            let sourcePtr := source.offset
            let destPtr := add(destination, 0x20)
            let bytes := mul(length, 0x20)

            calldatacopy(destPtr, sourcePtr, bytes)
        }
    }

    // ⚡ 高性能哈希
    function efficientHash(bytes calldata data) external pure returns (bytes32 result) {
        assembly {
            result := keccak256(data.offset, data.length)
        }
    }

    // 🎯 内存高效的字符串操作
    function compareStrings(
        string calldata a,
        string calldata b
    ) external pure returns (bool equal) {
        assembly {
            equal := and(
                eq(a.length, b.length),
                eq(keccak256(a.offset, a.length), keccak256(b.offset, b.length))
            )
        }
    }

    // 🚀 高级:自定义内存管理
    function customMemoryAllocation(uint256 size) external pure returns (bytes memory result) {
        assembly {
            // 获取空闲内存指针
            result := mload(0x40)

            // 设置数组长度
            mstore(result, size)

            // 更新空闲内存指针
            mstore(0x40, add(result, add(0x20, size)))
        }
    }
}

第五步:Real-World(真实世界)优化案例研究 💼

案例研究 1:DeFi Token Contract(DeFi 代币合约)优化 📈

挑战:

  • 原始合约:每次转账 180,000 gas
  • 批量转账:100 次转账 250 万 gas
  • 用户抱怨高费用
  • 竞争对手的成本降低 60%

解决方案:

contract OptimizedToken {
    mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
    mapping(address => mapping(address => uint256)) public allowances;

    uint256 public totalSupply;
    string public name;
    string public symbol;
    uint8 public decimals;

    // 🎯 具有单个存储读取的 Gas 优化转账
    function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) external returns (bool) {
        address from = msg.sender;
        uint256 fromBalance = balances[from];

        require(fromBalance >= amount, "Insufficient balance");
        require(to != address(0), "Invalid recipient");

        // 每个地址的单个存储写入
        balances[from] = fromBalance - amount;
        balances[to] += amount;

        emit Transfer(from, to, amount);
        return true;
    }

    // 🚀 超高效的批量转账
    function batchTransfer(
        address[] calldata recipients,
        uint256[] calldata amounts
    ) external returns (bool) {
        uint256 length = recipients.length;
        require(length == amounts.length && length > 0, "Invalid input");

        address sender = msg.sender;
        uint256 senderBalance = balances[sender];
        uint256 totalAmount = 0;

        // 在第一次传递中计算总和
        for (uint256 i = 0; i < length; i++) {
            totalAmount += amounts[i];
        }

        require(senderBalance >= totalAmount, "Insufficient balance");

        // 在第二次传递中更新余额
        balances[sender] = senderBalance - totalAmount;

        for (uint256 i = 0; i < length; i++) {
            address recipient = recipients[i];
            uint256 amount = amounts[i];

            balances[recipient] += amount;
            emit Transfer(sender, recipient, amount);
        }

        return true;
    }

    // 🔥 汇编优化的余额检查
    function getBalances(
        address[] calldata users
    ) external view returns (uint256[] memory balanceList) {
        uint256 length = users.length;
        balanceList = new uint256[](length);

        assembly {
            let balancesSlot := balances.slot
            let balanceListPtr := add(balanceList, 0x20)

            for { let i := 0 } lt(i, length) { i := add(i, 1) } {
                let user := calldataload(add(users.offset, mul(i, 0x20)))

                // 计算映射的存储插槽
                mstore(0x00, user)
                mstore(0x20, balancesSlot)
                let slot := keccak256(0x00, 0x40)

                // 加载余额并存储在结果数组中
                let balance := sload(slot)
                mstore(add(balanceListPtr, mul(i, 0x20)), balance)
            }
        }
    }

    event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
}

结果:

  • 新的转账函数:65,000 gas(减少 64%)
  • 批量转账:100 次转账 800,000 gas(减少 68%)
  • 用户采用率提高了 300%
  • 协议节省了 200 万美元以上的 gas 费用

案例研究 2:NFT Marketplace(NFT 市场)Gas 战争 🎨

contract OptimizedNFTMarketplace {
    struct Listing {
        uint128 price;          // 足够满足大多数 NFT 价格
        uint64 deadline;        // Unix 时间戳适合 uint64
        uint32 royaltyBps;      // 基点 (0-10000)
        uint32 listingId;       // 唯一标识符
    }

    mapping(address => mapping(uint256 => Listing)) public listings;
    mapping(uint256 => address) public listingOwners;

    uint256 private constant ROYALTY_DENOMINATOR = 10000;

    // 🚀 具有打包结构的优化列表
    function createListing(
        address nftContract,
        uint256 tokenId,
        uint128 price,
        uint64 deadline,
        uint32 royaltyBps
    ) external returns (uint32 listingId) {
        require(price > 0, "Invalid price");
        require(deadline > block.timestamp, "Invalid deadline");
        require(royaltyBps <= ROYALTY_DENOMINATOR, "Invalid royalty");

        listingId = uint32(block.timestamp); // 简单的 ID 生成

        // 将所有数据打包到单个存储插槽中
        listings[nftContract][tokenId] = Listing({
            price: price,
            deadline: deadline,
            royaltyBps: royaltyBps,
            listingId: listingId
        });

        listingOwners[listingId] = msg.sender;

        emit ListingCreated(nftContract, tokenId, price, deadline, listingId);
    }

    // 🎯 具有最小存储读取的 Gas 高效购买
    function purchase(
        address nftContract,
        uint256 tokenId
    ) external payable {
        Listing memory listing = listings[nftContract][tokenId];
        require(listing.price > 0, "Not listed");
        require(block.timestamp <= listing.deadline, "Expired");
        require(msg.value >= listing.price, "Insufficient payment");

        address seller = listingOwners[listing.listingId];
        require(seller != address(0), "Invalid listing");

        // 在单个操作中计算版税
        uint256 royalty = (listing.price * listing.royaltyBps) / ROYALTY_DENOMINATOR;
        uint256 sellerAmount = listing.price - royalty;

        // 首先清空列表(重入保护)
        delete listings[nftContract][tokenId];
        delete listingOwners[listing.listingId];

        // 转账 NFT 和付款
        IERC721(nftContract).transferFrom(seller, msg.sender, tokenId);

        if (royalty > 0) {
            payable(nftContract).transfer(royalty); // 假设合约处理版税
        }
        payable(seller).transfer(sellerAmount);

        // 退还多余的付款
        if (msg.value > listing.price) {
            payable(msg.sender).transfer(msg.value - listing.price);
        }

        emit Purchase(nftContract, tokenId, msg.sender, listing.price);
    }

    event ListingCreated(
        address indexed nftContract,
        uint256 indexed tokenId,
        uint256 price,
        uint256 deadline,
        uint256 listingId
    );

    event Purchase(
        address indexed nftContract,
        uint256 indexed tokenId,
        address indexed buyer,
        uint256 price
    );
}
interface IERC721 {
    function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint256 tokenId) external;
}

Gas Optimization(Gas 优化)核对清单 🛡️

Pre-Deployment Optimization(预部署优化)审计

contract GasAuditChecklist {
    // ✅ Storage Layout Optimization(存储布局优化)
    struct OptimizedStruct {
        uint256 largeValue;     // 使用完整插槽
        uint128 mediumValue1;   // 与下一个打包
        uint128 mediumValue2;   // 与上面相同的插槽
        uint64 smallValue1;     // 打包多个小值
        uint64 smallValue2;
        uint64 smallValue3;
        uint64 smallValue4;     // 所有 4 个都适合一个插槽
        bool flag1;             // 打包布尔值
        bool flag2;
        bool flag3;             // 一个插槽中的多个布尔值
    }

    // ✅ Function Visibility Optimization(函数可见性优化)
    function externalFunction(uint256[] calldata data) external pure returns (uint256) {
        // 外部 + 用于外部调用的 Calldata
        return _internalLogic(data);
    }

    function _internalLogic(uint256[] calldata data) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        // 内部用于重用逻辑
        uint256 sum = 0;
        uint256 length = data.length;

        for (uint256 i = 0; i < length; i++) {
            sum += data[i];
        }
        return sum;
    }

    // ✅ Event Optimization(事件优化)
    event OptimizedEvent(
        address indexed user,       // 索引用于过滤
        uint256 indexed amount,     // 索引用于过滤
        bytes32 indexed hash,       // 最多 3 个索引参数
        uint256 timestamp,          // 非索引数据
        bytes data                  // 可变长度数据
    );

    // ✅ Error Handling Optimization(错误处理优化)
    error InsufficientBalance(uint256 available, uint256 required);
    error InvalidRecipient(address recipient);
    error TransferFailed();

    function optimizedTransfer(address to, uint256 amount) external {
        uint256 balance = balances[msg.sender];

        if (balance < amount) {
            revert InsufficientBalance(balance, amount);
        }

        if (to == address(0)) {
            revert InvalidRecipient(to);
        }

        balances[msg.sender] = balance - amount;
        balances[to] += amount;

        emit Transfer(msg.sender, to, amount);
    }

    mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
    event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
}

The Gas Optimization Advantage(Gas 优化优势) 💫

🎯 Cost Reduction(成本降低) —— 节省 50–80% 的交易成本

User Adoption(用户采用) —— 负担得起的交易可推动使用

🛡️ Competitive Edge(竞争优势) —— 比竞争对手更低的成本

📈 Scalability(可扩展性) —— 处理更多用户而不会造成网络拥塞

🔧 Professional Grade(专业级) —— 可用于生产的优化技术

The Bottom Line(底线) 🎯

Gas 优化原型和可用于生产的 dApp 之间的区别。了解存储布局、内存管理、循环优化和汇编技术可以为你的用户节省数百万美元的交易成本,并使你的协议对每个人都可访问,而不仅仅是加密货币鲸鱼。

五个步骤的精通路径 —— 存储战争、内存精通、循环优化、高级模式和 Real-World(真实世界)案例研究 —— 提供了构建用户实际想要交互的 Gas 高效合约所需的一切。

Key Takeaways(主要收获) 📝

✅ 存储打包可节省 50–80% 的状态修改

✅ 对于外部函数,Calldata 比内存便宜得多

✅ 循环优化可防止失控的 Gas 成本

✅ 汇编为关键函数提供 30–50% 的额外节省

✅ 位操作可实现超高效的数据存储

✅ Real-World(真实世界)测试揭示了优化机会

无论你是在构建下一个 DeFi 协议、NFT 市场还是 GameFi 平台,Gas 优化都能为你提供竞争优势,使你的 dApp 具有可访问性和盈利能力。下一个百万美元的节省仅一步之遥!🚀💎

  • 原文链接: coinsbench.com/gas-wars-...
  • 登链社区 AI 助手,为大家转译优秀英文文章,如有翻译不通的地方,还请包涵~
点赞 0
收藏 1
分享
本文参与登链社区写作激励计划 ,好文好收益,欢迎正在阅读的你也加入。

0 条评论

请先 登录 后评论
CoinsBench
CoinsBench
https://coinsbench.com/